Thomas Hardy monument revealed to be older than Stonehenge

Research on a prehistoric burial site beneath the writer’s home has shown that it is the earliest known large circular enclosure in Britain.

The Flagstones monument has been re-dated to about 3,200 years BC, approximately two centuries earlier than previously thought.

Archaeologists have used advanced radiocarbon analysis to examine some of the finds, including human remains, red deer antlers and charcoal.

READ MORE: Blundering driver slammed after 4×4 gets marooned in sea

The analysis suggests that Flagstones near Dorchester, Dorset, may have served as a prototype for later monuments like Stonehenge.

It was discovered in the 1980s during the construction of the Dorchester by-pass and excavations showed it was formed of a 100m diameter circular ditch made of intersecting pits probably an earthwork bank.

Today, half of the site lies beneath the by-pass with the remainder beneath Max Gate – author Thomas Hardy’s former home now bequeathed to the National Trust.

Flagstones is a scheduled monument with finds and excavation archives preserved at Dorset Museum.

At least four burials were found to have been placed in the enclosure pits, a cremated adult and three children who had not been cremated and there were three partial cremations of adults elsewhere.

The similarity of this site to the first phase of Stonehenge, dated to about 2900 BC, led to the assumption that Flagstones must be of a similar date.

The new findings suggest the early Neolithic activity, including the digging of pits, took place in about 3650 BC.

After a gap of many centuries, the circular ditched enclosure was created in about 3200 BC, with burials placed within it immediately afterwards.

A later burial of a young adult male under a large sarsen stone at the centre of the enclosure took place about 1,000 years or so after its initial use.

The research was done by the University of Exeter and Historic England.

“Flagstones is an unusual monument; a perfectly circular ditched enclosure with burials and cremations associated with it,” said Dr Susan Greaney of Exeter University.

“In some respects it looks like monuments that come earlier which we call causewayed enclosures and in others it looks a bit like things that come later that we call henges.

“But we didn’t know where it sat between these types of monuments – and the revised chronology places it in an earlier period than we expected.”

“The chronology of Flagstones is essential for understanding the changing sequence of ceremonial and funeral monuments in Britain.

“The ‘sister’ monument to Flagstones is Stonehenge, whose first phase is almost identical but it dates to around 2900 BC.

“Could Stonehenge have been a copy of Flagstones?

“Or do these findings suggest our current dating of Stonehenge might need revision?”
Flagstones also reveals connections to other significant sites, including Llandygái ‘Henge’ A in Gwynedd, Wales and even locations in Ireland as implied by artefacts and burial practices.

The findings highlight the interconnectedness of Neolithic communities across Britain and beyond, as reported by What’s The Jam.

READ MORE: Lazy workmen leave residents baffled after painting weeds while doing road markings